1998 Legislation
Print Friendly

HOUSE BILL NO. 712, As Amended – Cities, increase budget, when

HOUSE BILL NO. 712, As Amended

View Daily Data Tracking History

View Bill Text

View Statement of Purpose / Fiscal Impact



Text to be added within a bill has been marked with Bold and
Underline. Text to be removed has been marked with
Strikethrough and Italic. How these codes are actually displayed will
vary based on the browser software you are using.

This sentence is marked with bold and underline to show added text.

This sentence is marked with strikethrough and italic, indicating
text to be removed.

Daily Data Tracking History



H0712aa.............................................by REVENUE AND TAXATION
CITIES - BUDGETS - Amends existing law to provide that cities may increase
their budget if their levy is below a certain figure and to provide for an
election.

02/16    House intro - 1st rdg - to printing
02/17    Rpt prt - to Rev/Tax
03/02    Rpt out - to Gen Ord
03/04    Rpt out amen - to engros
03/05    Rpt engros - 1st rdg - to 2nd rdg as amen
03/06    2nd rdg - to 3rd rdg as amen
03/09    3rd rdg as amen - PASSED - 59-8-3
      AYES -- Barraclough, Bell, Bieter, Bivens, Black(15), Black(23), Boe,
      Bruneel, Callister, Campbell, Chase, Crane, Crow, Cuddy, Deal,
      Denney, Ellsworth, Field(20), Gould, Hadley, Hansen, Henbest,
      Hornbeck, Jaquet, Jones(9), Jones(22), Judd, Kellogg, Kempton,
      Kendell, Kjellander, Lake, Linford, Mader, Marley, McKague, Meyer,
      Miller, Mortensen, Newcomb, Pischner, Pomeroy, Reynolds, Richman,
      Ridinger, Robison, Sali, Schaefer, Stevenson, Stoicheff, Stone,
      Stubbs, Taylor, Tippets, Trail, Watson, Wheeler, Zimmermann,
      Mr Speaker
      NAYS -- Alltus, Barrett, Clark, Geddes, Kunz, Loertscher, Tilman,
      Wood
      Absent and excused -- Field(13), Gagner, Jones(20),
    Floor Sponsor - Linford
    Title apvd - to Senate
03/10    Senate intro - 1st rdg as amen - to Loc Gov
03/12    Rpt out - rec d/p - to 2nd rdg as amen
03/13    2nd rdg - to 3rd rdg as amen
03/18    3rd rdg as amen - PASSED - 34-0-1
      AYES--Andreason, Boatright, Branch, Bunderson, Burtenshaw, Cameron,
      Crow, Danielson, Darrington, Deide, Dunklin, Frasure, Geddes,
      Hawkins, Ingram, Ipsen, Keough, King, Lee, McLaughlin, Noh, Parry,
      Richardson, Riggs, Risch, Sandy, Schroeder, Sorensen, Stennett,
      Sweeney, Thorne, Twiggs, Wheeler, Whitworth
      NAYS--None
      Absent and excused--Hansen
    Floor Sponsor - Hawkins
    Title apvd - to House
03/19    To enrol - rpt enrol - Sp signed
    Pres signed - to Governor
03/26    Governor signed
         Session Law Chapter 407
         Effective: 01/01/98

Bill Text


H0712


                                                                        
 ||||              LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF IDAHO             ||||
Fifty-fourth Legislature                 Second Regular Session - 1998
                                                                        

                             IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              HOUSE BILL NO. 712, As Amended

                            BY REVENUE AND TAXATION COMMITTEE

 1                                        AN ACT
 2    RELATING TO LIMITATION ON BUDGET REQUESTS BY TAXING DISTRICTS;  AMENDING  SEC-
 3        TION  63-802, IDAHO CODE, TO PROVIDE THAT CITIES MAY INCREASE THEIR BUDGET
 4        IF THEIR LEVY IS BELOW A CERTAIN FIGURE AND TO PROVIDE  FOR  AN  ELECTION;
 5        DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND PROVIDING RETROACTIVE APPLICATION.

 6    Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Idaho:

 7        SECTION  1.  That  Section  63-802, Idaho Code, be, and the same is hereby
 8    amended to read as follows:

 9        63-802.  LIMITATION ON BUDGET REQUESTS -- LIMITATION  ON  TAX  CHARGES  --
10    EXCEPTIONS.  (1)  Except as provided in subsection (2) of this section for tax
11    year 1995, and each year thereafter, no taxing district shall certify a budget
12    request for an amount of property tax revenues to  finance  an  annual  budget
13    that exceeds the greater of:
14        (a)  The  dollar  amount of property taxes certified for its annual budget
15        for any one (1) of the three (3) tax years preceding the current tax year,
16        whichever is greater, which amount may be increased by a growth factor  of
17        not  to  exceed  three  percent (3%) plus the amount of revenue that would
18        have been generated by applying the levy of the previous year, not includ-
19        ing any levy described in subsection (3) of this section, to any  increase
20        in  market  value  subject  to taxation resulting from new construction or
21        change of land use classification as evidenced by the value shown  on  the
22        new  construction  roll  compiled pursuant to section 63-301A, Idaho Code;
23        and by the value of annexation during the previous calendar year, as  cer-
24        tified by the state tax commission for market values of operating property
25        of public utilities and by the county assessor; or
26        (b)  The  dollar  amount of property taxes certified for its annual budget
27        during the last year in which a levy was made; or
28        (c)  The dollar amount of the actual budget request, if  the  taxing  dis-
29        trict is newly created; or
30        (d)  In  the  case of school districts, the restriction imposed in section
31        33-802, Idaho Code; or
32        (e)  In the case of a nonschool district for which less than  the  maximum
33        allowable  increase  in  the dollar amount of property taxes is  certified
34        for annual budget purposes in any one (1) year, such a  district  may,  in
35        any  following year, recover the foregone increase by certifying, in addi-
36        tion to any increase otherwise allowed, an amount not to exceed  one  hun-
37        dred  percent  (100%) of the increase originally foregone. Said additional
38        amount  shall  be  included  in  future  calculations  for  increases   as
39        allowed ; or 
40         (f)  In the case of cities, if the immediately preceding year's levy
41        subject  to  the  limitation provided by this section, is less than 0.004,
42        the city may increase its budget by an amount not to exceed the difference
43        between 0.004 and actual prior year's levy multiplied by the prior  year's


                                          2

 1        market  value  for  assessment  purposes.  The  additional  amount must be
 2        approved by sixty percent (60%) of the voters voting on the question at an
 3        election called for that purpose and held on the date in May  or  November
 4        provided by law, and may  be included in the annual budget of the city for
 5        purposes of this section .
 6        (2)  No  board  of  county  commissioners  shall set a levy, nor shall the
 7    state tax commission approve a levy for annual budget purposes  which  exceeds
 8    the  limitation imposed in subsection (1) of this section, unless authority to
 9    exceed such  limitation  has  been  approved  by  a  majority  of  the  taxing
10    district's electors voting on the question at an election called for that pur-
11    pose  and  held pursuant to section 34-106, Idaho Code, provided however, that
12    such voter approval shall be for a period of not to exceed two (2) years.
13        (3)  The amount of property tax revenues to finance an annual budget  does
14    not  include revenues from nonproperty tax sources, and does not include reve-
15    nue from levies that are voter approved for bonds, override levies or  supple-
16    mental  levies,  plant  facilities  reserve fund levies, school emergency fund
17    levies or for levies applicable to newly annexed property or for levies appli-
18    cable to new construction as evidenced by the value of property subject to the
19    occupancy tax pursuant to section 63-317, Idaho Code, for  the  preceding  tax
20    year.

21        SECTION  2.  An  emergency  existing  therefor,  which emergency is hereby
22    declared to exist, this act shall be in full force and effect on and after its
23    passage and approval, and retroactively to January 1, 1998.

Statement of Purpose / Fiscal Impact


    





                          STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
                                RS 07886
                                    
    
    This bill is designed to provide a mechanism by which cities 
    that have been locked in at a very low property tax levy rate to 
    respond to ongoing service delivery needs with voter approval. This 
    legislation would allow cities with levies less than 0.004 to 
    increase their property tax budget if approved by a majority of the 
    voters voting on the question at an election called for that 
    purpose. The maximum amount that a city could increase its budget 
    by this method would be the difference between 0.004 and the actual 
    prior year's levy multiplied by the prior year's net taxable value.
    
                               FISCAL NOTE
    
    Voter approval would be required for implementation. The 
    fiscal impact would be dependent on the amount approved by the 
    voters.
    
    CONTACT: Rep Golden Linford
    Phone: 332-1000
    
    STATEMENT OF PURPOSE/ FISCAL NOTE
    
    H 712