View Daily Data Tracking History
View Bill Text
SCR134.....................................................by STATE AFFAIRS
WOLF CONSERVATION/MANAGEMENT PLAN - Stating findings of the Legislature and
approving, conditioned upon amendment, the Idaho Wolf Conservation and
Management Plan.
03/04 Senate intro - 1st rdg - to printing
Rpt prt - to Res/Env
03/05 Rpt out - rec d/p - to 10th Ord
03/06 10th Ord - ADOPTED - 34-0-1
AYES -- Andreason, Boatright, Branch(Bartlett), Brandt, Bunderson,
Burtenshaw, Cameron, Darrington, Davis, Deide, Dunklin, Frasure,
Geddes, Goedde, Hawkins, Hill, Ingram, Ipsen, Keough, King-Barrutia,
Little, Lodge, Marley, Noh, Richardson, Risch, Sandy, Schroeder,
Sorensen, Stegner, Stennett, Thorne, Wheeler, Williams
NAYS -- None
Absent and excused -- Sims
Floor Sponsors - Hawkins & Noh
Title apvd - to House
03/06 House intro - 1st rdg - to Res/Con
03/14 Rpt out - rec d/p - to 2nd rdg
Rls susp - ADOPTED - 58-9-3
AYES -- Barraclough, Bedke, Bell, Bieter, Black, Block, Boe, Bolz,
Bradford, Bruneel, Callister, Campbell, Clark, Collins, Crow, Cuddy,
Denney, Ellis, Ellsworth, Eskridge, Field(13), Field(20), Gagner,
Gould, Hadley, Hammond, Henbest, Higgins, Hornbeck, Jaquet, Jones,
Kunz, Lake, Loertscher, Mader, Martinez, Meyer, Montgomery,
Mortensen, Moyle, Pearce, Pischner, Pomeroy, Raybould, Ridinger,
Robison, Schaefer, Sellman, Shepherd, Smith(33), Smith(23), Smylie,
Stevenson, Stone, Tilman, Trail, Wheeler, Young, Mr. Speaker
NAYS -- Barrett, Harwood, Hornbeck, Kendell, Langford, McKague,
Roberts, Sali, Wood
Absent and excused -- Aikele, Deal, Kellogg
Floor Sponsor - Wheeler
Title apvd - to Senate
03/14 To enrol
03/15 Rpt enrol - Pres Signed - Sp signed
03/15 To Secretary of State
|||| LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF IDAHO ||||
Fifty-sixth Legislature Second Regular Session - 2002
IN THE SENATE
SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 134
BY STATE AFFAIRS COMMITTEE
1 A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
2 STATING FINDINGS OF THE LEGISLATURE AND APPROVING, CONDITIONED UPON AMENDMENT,
3 THE IDAHO WOLF CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN.
4 Be It Resolved by the Legislature of the State of Idaho:
5 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 36-715, Idaho Code, the Idaho Department of
6 Fish and Game, in conjunction with the Wolf Oversight Committee, has completed
7 an Idaho Wolf Conservation and Management Plan, identified as "Draft 17" and
8 dated January 2002, and submitted the plan to the Legislature for review; and
9 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 36-2405, Idaho Code, management plans are
10 subject to legislative approval, amendment or rejection by concurrent resolu-
11 tion; and
12 WHEREAS, based upon review of the plan, the Legislature of the State of
13 Idaho, herein amends the plan as follows:
14 Draft 17 - Page 4 of 32. The first full paragraph of the page shall be
15 amended as follows:
16 "The goal of this conservation and management plan is to ensure the long-
17 term survival of wolves in Idaho while minimizing wolf-human conflicts that
18 result when wolves and people live in the same vicinity. Conservation of
19 wolves requires management. Management for wolves means ensuring adequate num-
20 bers for long-term persistence of the species as well as ensuring that land-
21 owners, land managers, other citizens, and their property are protected. Sec-
22 tion 1, Article I of the Constitution of the State of Idaho reads "All men are
23 by nature free and equal, and have certain inalienable rights, among which are
24 enjoying and defending life and liberty; acquiring, possessing and protecting
25 property; pursuing happiness and securing safety." The Governor's Office of
26 Species Conservation shall begin immediate discussions with the United States
27 Fish and Wildlife Service to define how the rights guaranteed by Section 1,
28 Article I, of the Constitution of the State of Idaho will be preserved and
29 recognized. Without management, conservation is overcome by conflict. The
30 State of Idaho is committed to the conservation of wolves on the record asking
31 the federal government to remove wolves from the state by the adoption in 2001
32 of House Joint Memorial No. 5. The position reflected in House Joint Memorial
33 No. 5 continues to be the official position of the State of Idaho. However, in
34 order to use every available option to mitigate the severe impacts on the res-
35 idents of the State of Idaho, the state will seek delisting and manage wolves
36 at recovery levels that will ensure viable, self-sustaining populations."
37 Draft 17 - Page 4 of 32. Subsection 2) shall be amended as follows:
38 "Classification or Status of the Wolf - In order to protect wolf popula-
39 tions by enforcing regulations and issuing citations for illegal take and by
40 limiting and regulating legal take, wolves will be classified as either a big
41 game animal, or furbearer, or special classification of predator that provides
42 for controlled take after delisting, at the discretion of the Idaho Fish and
43 Game Commission (I.C. section 36-201).
44 Draft 17 - Page 4 of 32. Subsection 3) shall be amended as follows:
2
1 "Population Objectives - Wolf population estimates are, at best,
2 approximations, and establishment of specific population sizes to be main-
3 tained is not realistic. In most instances, wolves can be managed similarly to
4 how (note 4, p. 31) other large native mammalian predators (black bears and
5 mountain lions) are traditionally managed. IDFG will manage wolves within the
6 state according to the chart on page 5 (Table 1). IDFG's guiding principle,
7 however, will be to allow wolves to naturally expand their range provided that
8 wolf-related problems remain under control. If it can be shown that wolves can
9 expand their range without causing unacceptable conflict, they will be allowed
10 to do so. However, population growth is unlikely to be controlled by sport
11 hunting. In general, regardless of their location, wolf packs that are not
12 creating conflict will be allowed to persist. No hunting of wolves should be
13 authorized for a period of 5 years following transfer of management (note 1,
14 p. 31)."
15 Draft 17 - Page 4 of 32. Subsection 8) shall be amended as follows:
16 "Education - Establish a strong public education program that emphasizes
17 wolf biology, management, and conservation, and presents a balanced view of
18 the societal impacts and costs of wolf reintroduction. Input from economic
19 sectors will be included in the presentation of the overall wolf educational
20 component to be presented at any educational presentation."
21 Draft 17 - Page 7 of 32. The last paragraph shall be amended as follows:
22 "IDFG is charged by statute with the management of Idaho's wildlife (Idaho
23 Code section 36-103(a): "All wildlife, including all wild animals, wild birds,
24 and fish, within the state of Idaho, is hereby declared to be the property of
25 the state of Idaho. It shall be preserved, protected, perpetuated, and man-
26 aged. It shall be only captured or taken at such times or places, under such
27 conditions, or by such means, or in such manner, as will preserve, protect and
28 perpetuate such wildlife, and provide for the citizens of this state and, as
29 by law permitted to others, continued supplies of such wildlife for hunting,
30 fishing and trapping."). This plan will enable the transition of the manage-
31 ment of the gray wolf back to the IDFG as either a big game animal, or fur-
32 bearer, or special classification of predator that provides for controlled
33 take after delisting. This cClassification as a big game animal or furbearer
34 will enable IDFG to provide protection for wolves, but does not necessarily
35 mean that IDFG will implement a harvest season as well as consider the impacts
36 of wolves on other big game species, those sectors of the economy dependent
37 upon sport hunting, livestock, domestic animals, and humans."
38 Draft 17 - Page 17 of 32. The last paragraph shall be amended as follows:
39 "Through a Memorandum of Understanding with the Idaho State Animal Damage
40 Control Board, USDA APHIS Wildlife Services is responsible for dealing with a
41 wide variety of wildlife damage problems including predation on livestock.
42 After delisting, including during the first five years, the Wildlife Services
43 Agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, in cooperation with the Idaho
44 Department of Fish and Game, will be responsible for depredation management
45 necessary for the protection of private property."
46 Draft 17 - Page 18 of 32. Subsection 1. shall be amended as follows:
47 "1. Manage wolves according to the chart on page 5 (Table 1) to ensure
48 that wolves will not become re-listed under the Endangered Species Act. If the
49 population continues to increase, wolves will be allowed to naturally expand
50 their range where packs can persist without creating conflict. The wolf popu-
51 lation will be managed at recovery levels that will ensure viable, self-sus-
52 taining populations until it can be established that wolves in increasing num-
53 bers will not adversely affect big game populations, the economic viability of
54 IDFG, outfitters and guides, and others who depend on a viable population of
55 big game animals. If the population falls below 15 packs, institute remedial
3
1 management measures (note 1, p. 31)."
2 Draft 17 - Page 18 of 32. Subsection 5. shall be amended as follows:
3 "5. Establish a strong public education program that emphasizes wolf biol-
4 ogy, management, and conservation and presents a balanced view of the societal
5 impacts and costs of wolf reintroduction. Outreach should be professionally
6 based and should address all issues concerning conservation and management and
7 present a balanced view of the impact of wolves on big game species, those
8 sectors of the economy dependent upon sport hunting, livestock, domestic ani-
9 mals, and humans. It is expected that Idaho Fish & Game will solicit coopera-
10 tion and advice from all vested interests in developing educational materials.
11 Currently, the USFWS is sponsoring a program in Idaho called Living with
12 Carnivores. Any program, including this one, that maintains balance and legit-
13 imacy, will be considered acceptable in light of this plan (note 6, p. 32).
14 The cost of wolf reintroduction will be presented as a part of any public edu-
15 cation program including direct and indirect costs."
16 Draft 17 - Page 18 of 32. The second paragraph under "Wolf Population
17 Objectives" shall be amended as follows:
18 "Wolf management programs will influence the size and distribution of the
19 population, although it will fluctuate with the availability and vulnerability
20 of native prey. Where wolves are causing depredations, their distribution and
21 numbers will have to be altered. When circumstances cause declines in the nat-
22 ural prey that are demonstrated as being attributable to wolf predation, man-
23 agement may be needed to temporarily reduce populations. In most instances,
24 wolves can be managed similarly to how other large native mammalian predators
25 are traditionally managed (note 4, p. 31). Population objectives are not
26 needed to effect these management activities. However, sport hunting has not
27 proven effective in the past to effectively manage wolf populations. The IDFG
28 is authorized to evaluate and use sport hunting or any other means necessary
29 to maintain wolf populations at recovery levels that will ensure a viable,
30 self-sustaining population until such time as all impacts are known."
31 Draft 17 - Page 18 of 32. The last paragraph under "Wolf Population Objec-
32 tives" begins on page 18 of 32 and ends on page 19 of 32, and shall be amended
33 as follows:
34 "The best protection for wolves will be an effective education program --
35 such as Living with Carnivores, or a similar program -- that increases public
36 understanding of the management and conservation of this species. In the
37 unlikely event the population falls below 10 packs, depredations will be
38 addressed with nonlethal control unless unusual circumstances absolutely
39 necessitate the use of lethal control to end the depredation problem. Except
40 for the lethal control measures, wolf management will revert to the same pro-
41 visions that were in effect to recover the wolf population prior to delisting
42 (50 CFR Part 17, page 80270)."
43 Draft 17 - Page 19 of 32. The first paragraph under "Incidental Take"
44 shall be amended as follows:
45 "Human-related accidental deaths of wolves (capture myopathy, automobile
46 accidents, etc.) Are expected to occur occasionally, and inadvertent take of
47 wolves by hunters and trappers during the course of otherwise legal actions is
48 not expected to adversely affect wolf population objectives. In an effort to
49 minimize such accidental take of wolves, IDFG will include a section on wolf
50 identification, and natural history a brief history of the reintroduction and
51 conflict created thereby, as part of all required hunter education classes and
52 provide similar information to all trapping license buyers."
53 Draft 17 - Page 20 of 32. The first paragraph under "Wolf Management"
54 shall be amended as follows:
55 "Wolves, when delisted, will become a component of the native resident
4
1 wildlife in Idaho. The designation of the wolf as a big game species, or as a
2 furbearer, or special classification of predator that provides for controlled
3 take provides legal authorization for Idaho Department of Fish and Game to
4 manage the species. Management includes inventory; predator-prey research;
5 harvest monitoring; cooperation with agencies, individuals, tribes, other
6 states, and Canada; control to reduce depredations; and dissemination to the
7 public of current, accurate information. In Idaho, hunting and trapping may be
8 considered in the future when populations are at levels that justify public
9 taking. If this is proposed by IDFG, there will be opportunity for full public
10 comment and decisions will be based on sound biological data. No hHunting of
11 wolves should may be authorized after Idaho receives management authority for
12 a period of 5 years following transfer of management (note 1, p. 31) when nec-
13 essary to meet big game harvest objectives and eliminate conflicts, while at
14 the same time maintaining wolves at recovery levels that will ensure viable,
15 self-sustaining populations."
16 Draft 17 - Page 22 of 32. The first paragraph under "Compensation for
17 Livestock Depredation" shall be amended as follows:
18 "Following delisting, cClaims for compensation for domestic animals killed
19 by wolves will should continue to be handled under the same process specified
20 for losses caused by mountain lions or black bears (Idaho Code section 36-115)
21 except that a separate depredation account will be established specifically
22 for wolf-caused losses. This wolf depredation account will be established and
23 maintained exclusively with federal, private, or other non-state funds paid by
24 Defenders of Wildlife."
25 Draft 17 - Page 22 of 32. The second paragraph under "Compensation for
26 Livestock Depredation" shall be amended as follows:
27 "Claims for compensation may be based on confirmed losses; suspected or
28 probable losses as compared to historical losses before wolf predation;
29 decrease in weaning or pregnancy rates based on historical data; or labor or
30 other expenses required to resolve disruption of ranch activities. While much
31 of this information may be difficult to verify or quantify, decisions should
32 be based on the best scientific or commercial evidence available. Other wolf
33 related losses are probably occurring. Decrease in weaning weights, pregnancy
34 rates, and disruption of ranch activities are examples of possible losses."
35 Draft 17 - Page 23 of 32. The first full paragraph shall be amended as
36 follows:
37 "Monitoring of prey populations, especially the deer species and elk, will
38 need to be continued. Similar to the predator, annual census of selected,
39 important prey populations should be conducted by IDFG and compared with data
40 collected prior to wolf reintroduction. It is extremely important that annual
41 census of these populations is conducted in order to detect trend and eventu-
42 ally to aid in developing predictions of population size. Factors that affect
43 prey numbers, including weather, habitat conditions, predation, and hunter
44 harvest, need to be fully assessed for these selected populations. Population
45 size estimates plus sex and age ratio data are minimum information to be
46 obtained from prey monitoring. More specific information on age structure,
47 both of the hunter harvest and wolf take, is desirable and should be obtained
48 when concerns about the level of wolf predation are raised. Wolves may cur-
49 rently be adversely affecting ungulate populations. The Idaho Fish and Game
50 Commission, with assistance from the Governor's Office of Species Conserva-
51 tion, shall begin immediate discussions with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Ser-
52 vice to define unacceptable levels of effect on ungulate populations by wolf
53 predation; specifically, they will define how these effects would be measured,
54 and will identify possible solutions."
55 Draft 17 - Page 23 of 32. The second full paragraph shall be amended as
5
1 follows:
2 "IDFG and the state legislature will seek the assistance of the Idaho con-
3 gressional delegation to obtain federal funding sources to pay for the cost of
4 wolf management (e.g., in FY2001, Interior appropriations budget contained
5 $188,000 for prey base monitoring). If the Idaho Congressional delegation is
6 unsuccessful at providing ongoing adequate funding to cover the cost of wolf
7 management, the State of Idaho is under no obligation to manage wolves. Pro-
8 vided, however, the State of Idaho is not precluded from using state resources
9 to eliminate or control wolf related conflict. IDFG will additionally seek
10 funding from outside entities, including wolf advocacy groups, to aid in all
11 wolf management efforts. The Governor's OSC is currently working with IDFG,
12 the Idaho Outfitters and Guides Association, and others to begin closer moni-
13 toring of prey populations now, so that better data will be available to man-
14 agers over time after delisting (note 1, p. 31)."
15 Draft 17 - Page 24 of 32. The final paragraph shall be amended as follows:
16 "This plan must be flexible enough to be compatible with the dynamics of
17 society and wildlife management. The plan must satisfy the USFWS, wolf advo-
18 cacy groups, livestock industry, outfitting industry, Idaho sportsmen, and a
19 diverse public. IDFG will update this plan periodically needs of the State of
20 Idaho in its effort to minimize the impact of wolves on the Idaho outfitting
21 industry, Idaho sportsmen, a diverse public and all others affected by wolf
22 introduction. IDFG will update this plan periodically and submit any changes
23 to the Idaho Legislature as if it were a new plan submitted for approval,
24 amendment or rejection under Section 36-2405, Idaho Code."
25 Draft 17 - Page 31 of 32. Subsection 1. The second paragraph shall be
26 amended as follows:
27 "The concern about the population exceeding the minimum came from
28 reviewers who are expert with full-fledged wolf populations, which inclines us
29 to favor that concern (Mech 2001). At the same time, we recognize the need to
30 clarify our numbers. In short, if the population falls below 15 packs, we will
31 begin instituting remedial measures, and if it falls below 10 packs, we will
32 revert to the control plan currently specified in federal rules (50 CFR 17).
33 If the population rises, we will not take specific action to lower it, but
34 will follow the guiding principle of limiting the population only to the
35 extent necessary for controlling wolf-related problems."
36 Draft 17 - Page 31 of 32. Subsection 1. The third paragraph shall be
37 amended as follows:
38 "Regarding federal decisions about de-listing and re-listing wolves and
39 the related issue of hunting and trapping, we clarify as follows. First,
40 regarding hunting, if the suggestion is borne out that hunting will become
41 necessary in less than 5 years after delisting, then IDFG may need to consider
42 opening a season on wolves as part of the wolf management program. The commit-
43 tee recommends that this option be considered as a last resort during the
44 first 5 years after de-listing, and be considered with customary
45 professionalism thereafter. Second, iIf the wolf population shrinks and
46 remains low, the committee does not presume whether wolves would be re-listed
47 under the ESA. To consider re-listing, the USFWS will follow whatever proce-
48 dures are current under Section 4 of ESA. Third, to remain clear of any possi-
49 ble confusion about the number of wolves necessary to de-list the currently
50 listed populations, the committee does not presume how wolves will be de-
51 listed, noting that the Governor's OSC is currently working with the USFWS and
52 a 3-state partnership to determine that."
53 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the members of the Second Regular Ses-
54 sion of the Fifty-sixth Idaho Legislature, the Senate and the House of Repre-
55 sentatives concurring therein, that the Idaho Wolf Conservation and Management
6
1 Plan shall be approved only upon amendment of the plan as set forth herein.