View Bill Status
View Bill Text
View Statement of Purpose / Fiscal Impact
H0550..............................................................by RINGO SCHOOLS - UNSAFE OR UNHEALTHY CONDITIONS LEVY - Amends existing law relating to the Constitutionally-based Educational Claims Act to remove authority for imposition of an educational necessity levy to abate unsafe or unhealthy conditions; and to remove provisions authorizing application of this section to certain pending lawsuits. 01/27 House intro - 1st rdg - to printing 01/28 Rpt prt - to Rev/Tax
]]]] LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF IDAHO ]]]] Fifty-seventh Legislature Second Regular Session - 2004IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES HOUSE BILL NO. 550 BY RINGO 1 AN ACT 2 RELATING TO THE CONSTITUTIONALLY BASED EDUCATIONAL CLAIMS ACT; AMENDING SEC- 3 TION 6-2214, IDAHO CODE, TO REMOVE AUTHORITY FOR IMPOSITION OF AN EDUCA- 4 TIONAL NECESSITY LEVY TO ABATE UNSAFE OR UNHEALTHY CONDITIONS; AND AMEND- 5 ING SECTION 6-2215, IDAHO CODE, TO REMOVE PROVISIONS AUTHORIZING APPLICA- 6 TION OF THIS SECTION TO CERTAIN PENDING LAWSUITS IN THE MANNER PROVIDED; 7 AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. 8 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Idaho: 9 SECTION 1. That Section 6-2214, Idaho Code, be, and the same is hereby 10 amended to read as follows: 11 6-2214. EDUCATIONAL NECESSITY LEVY.(1) In general.There is hereby cre- 12 ated an educational necessity levy that may be levied by a local school dis- 13 trict as authorized in this chapter. The educational necessity levy shall 14 expire upon order of the district court having jurisdiction over a suit 15 brought under this chapter or five (5) years after it comes into existence, 16 whichever comes first. An educational necessity levy authorized by this chap- 17 ter may be imposed under the terms of this chapter, notwithstanding the provi- 18 sions of section 63-802, Idaho Code. 19(2) For safety and health. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this20chapter, the district court may impose an educational necessity levy for the21purpose of raising revenues to abate unsafe or unhealthy conditions that have22been identified by findings of fact or a judgment of the district court, by a23consent agreement that has been accepted (with or without modification) by the24district court, or by a local school district plan to abate unsafe or25unhealthy conditions that has been accepted (with or without modification) by26the district court. The district court shall approve an educational necessity27levy if it finds that the school district has no alternative source of revenue28to use to abate unsafe or unhealthy conditions that have been identified by29findings of fact or judgment of the district court, by a consent agreement30that has been accepted (with or without modification) by the district court or31by a local school district plan to abate unsafe or unhealthy conditions that32has been accepted (with or without modification) by the district court. The33limitations of sections 6-2209 and 6-2210, Idaho Code, regarding the calcula-34tion of and the maximum amount of the educational necessity levy do not apply35to an educational necessity levy imposed to abate unsafe or unhealthy condi-36tions that have been identified by findings of fact or a judgment of the dis-37trict court, by a consent agreement that has been accepted (with or without38modification) by the district court, or by a local school district plan to39abate unsafe or unhealthy conditions that has been accepted (with or without40modification) by the district court.41 SECTION 2. That Section 6-2215, Idaho Code, be, and the same is hereby 42 amended to read as follows: 2 1 6-2215. EFFECT ON PENDING LAWSUITS.(1) Chapter to apply to pending2lawsuits.This chapter shall not apply to any lawsuit pending on its effective 3 datethat has not proceeded to final judgment in the district court on the4effective date of this amendment to this section if the lawsuit presents con-5stitutionally based educational claims or counterclaims by any patrons or by6the state of Idaho or state officers andbut shall apply to any lawsuit bring- 7 ing a constitutionally based educational claim filed after its effective 8 date. 9(2) Procedure for pending lawsuits. If this chapter applies to a lawsuit10pending on the effective date of this amendment to this section, all proceed-11ings in the lawsuit shall be suspended for fifty-six (56) days from the effec-12tive date of this amendment to this section, except to notify the district13court of the passage of this amendment and to allow refiling of complaints14consistent with this subsection. Any patrons who are parties to such a lawsuit15shall have the fifty-six (56) days of the suspension period to file parens16patriae complaint(s) consistent with the requirements of this chapter. The17legislature and superintendent of public instruction shall have the fifty-six18(56) days of the suspension period to file parens patriae complaint(s) consis-19tent with the requirements of this chapter. If a patron files a parens patriae20complaint under this subsection, the legislature and the superintendent of21public instruction may intervene as a matter of right pursuant to section226-2206, Idaho Code, within the time period prescribed by section 6-2206, Idaho23Code. If any complaints are filed under this subsection, separate complaints24shall be filed for each school district that is a defendant, and venue for25such a suit against a school district shall be in the county in which the26school district maintains its principal business office. At the expiration of27the fifty-six (56) day suspension period described in the first sentence of28this subsection, any school districts that are defendants to patron suits or29to parens patriae suits under this chapter shall be able to answer as provided30by the Idaho rules of civil procedure. All further proceedings in such a suit31shall be pursuant to this chapter.32(3) Dismissal of entities not parties and transfer of records in pending33lawsuit. School districts that were parties to a lawsuit that presented con-34stitutionally based educational claims or counterclaims on the effective date35of this section and that are not defendants in any complaints filed pursuant36to subsection (2) of this section shall no longer be parties and shall be dis-37missed from any proceedings that were suspended. Any defendant to a lawsuit38that presented constitutionally based educational claims or counterclaims on39the effective date of this section and who is not a defendant authorized by40this chapter shall be dismissed from any proceeding that was suspended. Any41plaintiff, defendant or an intervenor as of right to a lawsuit filed under42subsection (2) of this section in which there is a school district that was a43party to a lawsuit that presented constitutionally based educational claims or44counterclaims and which lawsuit was suspended under subsection (2) of this45section may designate the portions of the records of the suspended lawsuit46that pertain to the school district. Upon written request of the plaintiff,47the defendant, or an intervenor as of right or the court in a lawsuit filed48under subsection (2) of this section, those parts of the record designated by49the plaintiff, defendant or an intervenor as of right or the court shall be50copied by the clerk of the district court of the suspended lawsuit and for-51warded to the clerk of the district court presiding over the complaint filed52under subsection (2) of this section and shall be included in the record of53that case.54 SECTION 3. An emergency existing therefor, which emergency is hereby 3 1 declared to exist, this act shall be in full force and effect on and after its 2 passage and approval.
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE RS 13681 The purpose of this legislation is to repeal H 403AA which was passed in the 2003 Legislature. The law enacted by this legislation has been found unconstitutional by two district court judges. The decision to appeal will be costly, and the law does not address the inequities with respect to providing safe school facilities. FISCAL IMPACT There will be a savings as a result of terminating lawsuits. However, there will be lawsuits remaining which will continue to cost the State. Contact Name: Representatives Ringo, Trail, Sayler, Mitchell, Naccarato, Shepherd, Andersen, Martinez, Douglas, Boe, Pasley-Stewart, Robison, Smith, Henbest, Langhorst, Jaquet, and Senators Keough and Schroeder Phone: 332-1000 STATEMENT OF PURPOSE/FISCAL NOTE H 550