2004 Legislation
Print Friendly

HOUSE BILL NO. 571 – Drug court, fees

HOUSE BILL NO. 571

View Bill Status

View Bill Text

View Statement of Purpose / Fiscal Impact



Text to be added within a bill has been marked with Bold and
Underline. Text to be removed has been marked with
Strikethrough and Italic. How these codes are actually displayed will
vary based on the browser software you are using.

This sentence is marked with bold and underline to show added text.

This sentence is marked with strikethrough and italic, indicating
text to be removed.

Bill Status



H0571................................by JUDICIARY, RULES AND ADMINISTRATION
DRUG COURT - FEES - Amends and adds to existing law to provide for the
payment of a drug court fee; to provide that moneys in the County Drug
Court Fund may be expended for private counseling services; to provide that
the failure to pay the drug court fee may constitute grounds for
termination from drug court; to provide that certain unpaid drug court fees
shall be ordered by the court in the judgment of conviction unless waived
based upon a person's inability to pay; to provide that the drug court fee
shall be in addition to all other fines and fees levied; and to provide
that payment of the fee may be ordered as a term and condition of
probation.
                                                                        
01/28    House intro - 1st rdg - to printing
01/29    Rpt prt - to Jud
02/18    Rpt out - rec d/p - to 2nd rdg
02/19    2nd rdg - to 3rd rdg
02/23    3rd rdg - PASSED - 66-0-4
      AYES -- Andersen, Barraclough, Barrett, Bauer, Bayer, Bell, Black,
      Block, Boe, Bolz, Bradford, Campbell, Cannon, Clark, Collins, Crow,
      Deal, Denney, Douglas, Eberle, Edmunson, Ellsworth, Eskridge,
      Field(18), Field(23), Gagner, Garrett, Harwood, Henbest, Jaquet,
      Jones, Kellogg, Kulczyk, Langford, Langhorst, Martinez, McGeachin,
      McKague, Meyer, Miller, Mitchell, Moyle, Naccarato, Nielsen,
      Pasley-Stuart, Raybould, Ridinger, Ring, Ringo, Robison, Rydalch,
      Sali, Sayler, Schaefer, Shepherd, Shirley, Skippen, Smith(30),
      Smith(24), Smylie, Snodgrass, Stevenson, Trail, Wills, Wood, Mr.
      Speaker
      NAYS -- None
      Absent and excused -- Bedke, Cuddy, Lake, Roberts
    Floor Sponsor - Ring
    Title apvd - to Senate
02/24    Senate intro - 1st rdg - to Jud
03/02    Rpt out - rec d/p - to 2nd rdg
03/03    2nd rdg - to 3rd rdg
03/15    3rd rdg - PASSED - 29-0-6
      AYES -- Andreason, Bailey, Bunderson, Burkett, Burtenshaw,
      Calabretta, Compton, Darrington, Gannon, Geddes, Goedde, Hill,
      Ingram, Kennedy, Keough, Little, Lodge, Malepeai, Marley, McKenzie,
      McWilliams, Noble, Pearce, Richardson, Schroeder, Sorensen, Stegner,
      Sweet, Werk
      NAYS -- None
      Absent and excused -- Brandt, Cameron, Davis, Noh, Stennett, Williams
    Floor Sponsor - Sweet
    Title apvd - to House
03/16    To enrol
03/17    Rpt enrol - Sp signed
03/18    Pres signed - To Governor
03/23    Governor signed
         Session Law Chapter 249
         Effective: 07/01/04

Bill Text


                                                                        
                                                                        
  ]]]]              LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF IDAHO             ]]]]
 Fifty-seventh Legislature                 Second Regular Session - 2004
                                                                        
                                                                        
                              IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
                                                                        
                                     HOUSE BILL NO. 571
                                                                        
                      BY JUDICIARY, RULES AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
                                                                        
  1                                        AN ACT
  2    RELATING TO DRUG COURT FEES; AMENDING SECTION 31-3201E, IDAHO CODE, TO  REVISE
  3        TERMINOLOGY,  TO  MAKE  GRAMMATICAL CHANGES, TO PROVIDE THAT MONEYS IN THE
  4        COUNTY DRUG COURT FUND MAY BE EXPENDED FOR PRIVATE COUNSELING SERVICES, TO
  5        PROVIDE THAT THE FAILURE TO PAY THE DRUG COURT FEE MAY CONSTITUTE  GROUNDS
  6        FOR  TERMINATION FROM DRUG COURT, TO PROVIDE THAT TERMINATION SHALL NOT BE
  7        THE EXCLUSIVE REMEDY FOR FEE COLLECTION, TO PROVIDE  THAT  CERTAIN  UNPAID
  8        DRUG  COURT  FEES SHALL BE ORDERED BY THE COURT IN THE JUDGMENT OF CONVIC-
  9        TION UNLESS WAIVED BASED UPON A PERSON'S INABILITY TO PAY THE FEE, TO PRO-
 10        VIDE THAT THE DRUG COURT FEE SHALL BE IN ADDITION TO ALL OTHER  FINES  AND
 11        FEES  LEVIED  AND  TO  PROVIDE THAT PAYMENT OF THE FEE MAY BE ORDERED AS A
 12        TERM AND CONDITION OF PROBATION; AND AMENDING CHAPTER 56, TITLE 19,  IDAHO
 13        CODE, BY THE ADDITION OF A NEW SECTION 19-5608, IDAHO CODE, TO PROVIDE FOR
 14        THE PAYMENT OF A DRUG COURT FEE.
                                                                        
 15    Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Idaho:
                                                                        
 16        SECTION  1.  That Section 31-3201E, Idaho Code, be, and the same is hereby
 17    amended to read as follows:
                                                                        
 18        31-3201E.  PARTICIPANT DRUG COURT FEES -- DRUG  COURT  FUND.  Each  person
 19    admitted  into  a  drug  court  shall pay a drug court fee in an amount not to
 20    exceed three hundred dollars ($300) per month or a lesser amount as set by the
 21    administrative district judge for participants in the  drug  court.  For  good
 22    cause,  the  judge  presiding  over a drug court may exempt a participant from
 23    paying all or a portion of the drug court fee. The fee imposed under this sec-
 24    tion shall be paid to the clerk of the district court  for  deposit  into  the
 25    county drug court fund which is hereby created in each county which that has a
 26    drug court. Moneys in this fund may be accumulated from year to year and shall
 27    be  expended  exclusively  for  expenses  incurred in connection with the drug
 28    court including, but not limited to, substance abuse treatment, drug  testing,
 29    and  supervision  and  private counseling services utilized by the drug court.
 30    Any failure to pay the drug court fee may constitute grounds  for  termination
 31    from  drug court by the court, provided this shall not be the exclusive remedy
 32    for collection of the fee. If a participant is terminated from the drug  court
 33    prior  to successful completion of the program and a judgment of conviction is
 34    entered against the defendant, any unpaid drug court fee shall be  ordered  by
 35    the court in the judgment of conviction, provided the court may order such fee
 36    to be waived if the court determines that the person is indigent and unable to
 37    pay the fee. Such fee shall be in addition to all other fines and fees levied,
 38    and  the  payment  of  such fee may also be ordered as a term and condition of
 39    probation.
                                                                        
 40        SECTION 2.  That Chapter 56, Title 19, Idaho Code, be,  and  the  same  is
 41    hereby  amended by the addition thereto of a NEW SECTION, to be known and des-
 42    ignated as Section 19-5608, Idaho Code, and to read as follows:
                                                                        
                                           2
                                                                        
  1        19-5608.  DRUG COURT FEE. Each person admitted into a drug court shall pay
  2    the drug court fee as established in section 31-3201E, Idaho Code.

Statement of Purpose / Fiscal Impact



                       STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
                            RS 13582C1
This proposal is intended to close a "loophole" in the law
regarding Drug Court Participation Fees.  The proposed law is
intended to ensure that all participants are accountable for the
costs and fees that were incurred during their participation in
the program.  In a recent Idaho Court of Appeals case, State of
Idaho v. Jennifer McCool, 2003 WL21360739, Id App 2003, June 3,
2003 (unpublished opinion), the Court ruled that the requirement
to pay drug court fees does not survive termination from the drug
court program and cannot be ordered as a fee or restitution at
sentencing absent a statutory provision allowing such.  Drug
Court fees are necessary for the successful operation of the
program and can lawfully be ordered by a court for drug court
participants under Idaho Code 31-3201E.  It is unfair that
unsuccessful participants can be relieved of the burden to pay
the fees simply by not complying with the drug court conditions
and being terminated from the program.  This proposed change to
the law will allow the expense of the drug court treatment and
supervision to survive the termination from the program and allow
the sentencing judge to order the fees during sentencing or as a
cost that is a condition of probation.
                          FISCAL IMPACT

There is no anticipated impact on the General Fund.  There will
be a small increase in the Drug Court Fund.





Contact
Name: Rep. Bob Ring 
Phone: 332-1000




STATEMENT OF PURPOSE/FISCAL NOTE                    H 571