View Daily Data Tracking History
View Bill Text
SCR119.........................................................by SCHROEDER PHEASANT STOCKING - Stating findings of the Legislature and directing the Department of Fish and Game to provide data regarding documented effects to pheasant population as a result of pheasant stocking, with the exception of wildlife preserve areas; authorizing the Department of Fish and Game, with the exception of Wildlife Management Areas, to cease stocking of pheasants; and encouraging the Department to engage more effectively with private landowners in providing advice and incentives for improvement and retention of habitat. 01/17 Senate intro - 1st rdg - to printing 01/18 Rpt prt - to Res/Env
|||| LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF IDAHO |||| Fifty-sixth Legislature Second Regular Session - 2002IN THE SENATE SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 119 BY SCHROEDER 1 A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 2 STATING FINDINGS OF THE LEGISLATURE AND DIRECTING THE DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND 3 GAME TO PROVIDE DATA REGARDING DOCUMENTED EFFECTS TO PHEASANT POPULATION 4 AS A RESULT OF PHEASANT STOCKING WITH THE EXCEPTION OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT 5 AREAS, AUTHORIZING THE DEPARTMENT, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF WILDLIFE MANAGE- 6 MENT AREAS, TO CEASE THE STOCKING OF PHEASANTS AND ENCOURAGING THE DEPART- 7 MENT TO ENGAGE MORE EFFECTIVELY WITH PRIVATE LANDOWNERS IN PROVIDING 8 ADVICE AND INCENTIVES FOR IMPROVEMENT AND RETENTION OF HABITAT. 9 Be It Resolved by the Legislature of the State of Idaho: 10 WHEREAS, pheasant stocking has not been shown to effectively contribute 11 birds to either breeding populations or the hunter's bag. Stocked birds that 12 are taken are considered by many as an expensive subsidy for a limited number 13 of people at the expense of all hunters; and 14 WHEREAS, these conditions have been documented across pheasant ranges in 15 North America dating back to Pennsylvania in 1936, New Hampshire in 1938, Utah 16 and Wisconsin in the 1940's, and Montana and Minnesota in the 1950's; and 17 WHEREAS, habitat retention and improvement, particularly on privately held 18 lands, is known to be the most effective means to retain populations of pheas- 19 ants and other farm game and wildlife. 20 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the members of the Second Regular Ses- 21 sion of the Fifty-sixth Idaho Legislature, the Senate and the House of Repre- 22 sentatives concurring therein, that the Legislature requests that the Idaho 23 Department of Fish and Game provide scientific data showing the documented 24 effects to the pheasant population as a result of pheasant stocking in the 25 state of Idaho, with the exception of Wildlife Management Areas. The Legisla- 26 ture further authorizes the Idaho Department of Fish and Game, with the excep- 27 tion of Wildlife Management Areas, to cease the stocking of pheasants and 28 encourages the department to engage more effectively with private landowners 29 in providing advice and incentives for improvement and retention of habitat as 30 appropriate.